#80 - Interview with Djuna Lee & Ben Greene

Interviews by Kate Pass. Photos by James Whineray & Adam Buckley.

DJUNA LEE_PHOTO BY JAMES WHINERAY.jpeg

Kate: We’re really excited to hear your new band, jalan-jalan. What does jalan-jalan mean, and what can audiences expect on the night?


Djuna: Jalan-jalan means ‘to walk’ in Malay. I wanted our name to capture the energy we bring to the music. I like the way that our name references a walking bass, which creates a sense of movement and forward propulsion. You won’t hear many walking bass lines in our music but some of the more varied approaches I use evolved from these foundations, using groove and pulse as a starting point and moving into more melodic territory to form a more active counterpoint.

Kate: Can you tell us about your journey as a jazz musician, and how you became involved in the experimental side of improvisation?

Djuna: I have many fond memories of going to see PJS gigs at Hyde Park Hotel as a kid. It really inspired me to pursue music and go to WAAPA. Coming from more of a classical background, discovering how to improvise over chords and play jazz tunes was both intimidating and exciting. To some extent I think I’ve always tried to keep that feeling of unfamiliarity and excitement in the music that I play and this is maybe how I became more drawn to freer and more open playing.


Kate: As well as being an incredible musician, you’re also an architect! How does your design background influence your music?

Djuna: I find that both fields take inspiration from one another and there are many similarities in how I approach designing spaces and sounds. The design process can be very slow, sometimes taking years for a concept to become a physical reality so it’s nice to be able to just pick up my instrument and play - maybe this is what draws me to improvised music - the pace at which it can unfold.

Kate: What advice would you give to people experiencing improvised experimental music for the first time?

Djuna: For new listeners, experimental music can be unfamiliar and challenging in its mode of expression, but the uniqueness that can initially be confronting is also the music’s strength. One of the things I love about experimental music is that every musician approaches form in an entirely different and personal way, so the listening experience can be quite vulnerable and revealing. It doesn’t have to be serious or super introspective either; it can be lively, and fun. Jalan-jalan officially endorses dancing at our performances.

Kate: What are you most looking forward to at Audible Edge Festival?

Djuna: I’m feeling pretty inspired from what has been on so far and am really looking forward to Nika Mo’s album launch on April 14 at the Rechabite.

BEN GREENE (press photo 1) photo by Adam Buckley.jpeg

Kate: How would you describe your music? What can audiences expect on the night?

Ben: It’s always difficult to describe your own music, but what I can say is that it’s mostly informed by free jazz, experimental rock, post-bop and noise. There are some specifically composed sections and some loosely-structured free sections, all interwoven with passages of noise and improvisation. Everyone has been gradually incorporating effects into their set-ups as well so I feel like we’ve tapped into a really interesting blend of acoustic and electronic sounds.

Kate: Can you tell us about your journey as a musician, and how you became involved in the experimental side of improvisation?

Ben: I started out playing a lot of punk and metal but over time I found myself drawn to music which incorporated more improvisation. I got deep into progressive/experimental rock and free jazz and eventually found my way to non-idiomatic free improvisation and noise music. Drummers like Chris Corsano and Frank Rosaly were putting out some really interesting solo and collaborative work, so I started exploring similar approaches in my own practice and began experimenting with contact mics and guitar effects pedals. Once I started putting this stuff together, it became a big part of my sound and I brought these elements into the bands I was playing with. From there, it was a natural step to seek out more people to play with and I was introduced into the Perth experimental scene through regular gig series like Noizemaschin! and Outcome Unknown and through affiliation with the fine people at Tone List.

Kate: You’ve worked in such a diverse range of genres, from successful post-rock bands, jazz ensembles and now experimental new music. How does Ben Greene Sextet tap into all these different influences?

Ben: The use of improvisation, effects and noise passages during performance is something that we explored quite a bit in Tangled Thoughts of Leaving, so I feel like that may be one of the more direct comparisons that could be made. Given that the other two members of the trio orphans are also in this sextet, there is definitely some aesthetic and conceptual overlap there as well. Otherwise, I feel that the influence I’ve taken from different experiences is more generalised – things like approaches to structuring free improvisation, to writing and presenting scores, to utilising the strengths of your group and organising/leading productive rehearsals. These are all skills and approaches that I am still developing in leading the group, but I’ve definitely taken on board the ideas of others I have worked with who have handled these things well and have noticed the difference that it can make to the cohesiveness of a performance.

Kate: Your new sextet is an expansion of the trio orphans, and features some great musicians such as Dom Barrett, Jonathan Brittain, Adam Buckley, Dan O’Connor and Finn Owen. Has working with a larger ensemble changed your approach to drumming and composing?

Ben: Ha! Well, in putting the group together I was mostly selecting for people who’s playing I enjoyed and who I felt would be able to connect with the music and bring something special to the mix. With Dan and Dom on board, there is obviously a link to orphans, but I also have a noise-rock duo project with Adam called Dez Cartez, and have played with Finn and Jonathan in various funk, jazz and free settings. That is to say, I feel this group is an expansion of all of those musical relationships and so working with everyone at once has caused me to consider ways of integrating the drumming approaches I have taken in those different settings into one broader approach which can bring it all together. I’m going from more conventional jazz time-keeping, to playing totally free, to textural accompaniments, all while triggering effects and generating loops. These are all things I’ve done before but not necessarily in the same set of music, so it has been a great challenge to undertake.
As for the composition aspect, it is all quite new, so it is not so much changing as it is forming my approach. This will be the first time that I am presenting my own compositions in public, so I am equally terrified and excited about it!

Kate: What are you most looking forward to at Audible Edge Festival?

Ben: I think I’d have to give that nod to Paul Briggs and Gracie Smith, who are playing a duo set the night after our gig. Paul is the guitarist from Tangled Thoughts of Leaving and Gracie is their new drummer, who is also very active in the Perth experimental scene. Very interested to see what these two are up to – I’m expecting some noisy/doomy/jazzy vibes!

Kate: What advice would you give to people experiencing improvised experimental music for the first time?

Ben: I would say be sure to surrender yourself fully to the experience. As well as the expression of musical ideas, sometimes improvised music is just as much about the effect that sound itself has on the listener over time. This can mean that it requires a certain level of engagement in order to be fully appreciated (and sometimes closing your eyes can help). I personally have been taken on some amazingly transcendent and introspective journeys by great improvised performances. I suppose this can be true for all music, but I think being conscious of this can help to bridge any gap that you may notice between yourself and the performance. Having said that, improvised music is just like any other music in that sometimes it just isn’t very good (haha), or may not be to your taste… but don’t be discouraged! Come out and see a bunch of things and you may be pleasantly surprised.

TLQ#9 - Josten Myburgh

The same questions, asked to different improvisers in Perth. Credit for the idea, and some of the questions, goes to the Addlimb archive.
Photo taken by Zal Kanga Parabia.

InlandConcertSeries_ZKP (27 of 91).jpg
TL Text_Josten Myburgh.png

What led you to improvised music?

I grew up in Mandurah (a very small city about an hour south of Perth) so I found most music online. I’d listened to free jazz relatively early in life, maybe when I was around 14: Eric Dolphy, Cecil Taylor, John Coltrane and so on. My high school saxophone teacher encouraged me to explore that music further, but I never really felt like it was something one was actually allowed to do (and I had no one to do it with). When I came to study at WAAPA it instantly seemed more possible, so I started to improvise early into my studies, using my rudimentary saxophone extended techniques in compositions and improvising with other students in the course. I saw Golden Fur and Dans les arbes perform in my second year as a student, and I found both groups incredibly striking. Then when I met Michael McNab in Melbourne through the Speak Percussion Emerging Artist’s program, I realised there was a whole culture or ‘scene’ for this music specifically (before that, I didn’t separate it from all the other contemporary art music I was hearing at school). That’s what started the investigation more deeply, and I think it was amplified by how nice everyone in that scene was.

What instrument or equipment do you use to improvise, and what is your relationship with this equipment?

At the moment I’m mostly using alto saxophone, though I also sometimes play with a very harsh-sounding digital feedback system, and have also occasionally played Bb clarinet. In the last year or so, I have really managed to beat back a lot of demons about the saxophone, which for a long time was a source of pervasive anxiety. It is hard to undo ideas of what you “should” sound like, or what the “right way” of playing the instrument is. But since I have found ways to give myself permission to just practice what I like, and what I care about, the instrument has become extremely fun to play and I have gotten much better at playing it.

If I drop my fingers anywhere on the instrument, there’s an almost infinite range of possibilities I can achieve without moving my fingers. I feel really excited by this - way more excited than working out how to get through the fingerings really fast to make melodic lines (though I do respect people who can do this very well). The saxophone has such strange acoustics, that there are always surprises. It really feels limitless, and as I get better and feel more free and relaxed playing the instrument, I just notice more and more worlds open up.

I think I’m not precious about being “a saxophonist” or anything, though, and I still like the idea of doing radical about-turns at each gig, finding new ways to subvert my own habits and such.

What keeps you improvising? What do you think makes this music important, either personally, socially, politically, etc.

It’s really fun. Speaking a bit more broadly, though, I think my aforementioned encounters with improvised music as a younger person were what Alain Badiou would call “events”: they revealed the situated “truth” of this way of making music, and thanks to the visceral, transformative power of those encounters, it is no longer really possible for me to go on living or making music disregarding the impact of those moments or pretending they never happened. Pursuing truth for Badiou is real work against the normative order of things, and I really believe in this and its potential. What most people are able to experience in the world today is incredibly narrow, as adherence to the logics of the market has extinguished so many beautiful, fertile and specific things and the contexts for those things to grow and continue. We have algorithms and “curated” platforms superseding vital grassroots culture everywhere, and in Australia we have ossified, lofty cultural institutions and major festivals perpetuating the sense that art is what some people make and what other people observe. Continuing to make this strange, raw, visceral and ungraspable music, with an extremely low barrier for entry and extremely high ceiling of accomplishment, despite the near-total absence of material reward, actually feels pretty vital.

I am aware of criticisms of improvised music which highlight the fact that the shared comprehension of what this music is and how to do it, thanks to decades of history and practice as well as the increasing institutionalisation of the music in some small pockets of the world, means that many performances of improvised music are just a recycling of already-understood notions or tropes of freedom. Whilst I sympathise with this perspective to a degree, and enjoy thinking about it and through it, I also think it’s quite unfair to judge a process-based music for not achieving upheaval, or even success, the majority of the time. It remains viscerally true to me that a successful improvisation can re-write the world and what one believes to be possible or fertile in it. I think it is rather the oppressive social structures in which we live which lead to this recycling of tropes, not necessarily the practice of improvising itself - as well as the real difficulty of creating situations where profoundly new things can actually emerge. But these criticisms are nice calls to remain committed to unravelling all kinds of structures as we work on this music, and having a certain healthy distrust of intuition.

What are your feelings on the relationship between planning and spontaneity in improvisation?

I think spontaneity within a ‘planned’ framework is a fascinating way of discovering new things when the framework is clear and one is really focused and in-the-moment. I wonder if that’s what ‘free’ improvisation always is, even if the framework is unspoken. I particularly like it when groups of people, and their shared, emergent fascinations, become like frames, or scores.

How do you evaluate or reflect upon improvisations you’ve played? How does the evaluation of a recording differ from the evaluation of a performance?

If I thought something went well, or had a lot of potential, or that it might’ve suited being listened to as a recording, I will listen to it a lot and try and find ways of articulating what was suggested by it. If I didn’t think it went well, I think I just try and leave it alone - would rather listen to other things that I love!

I’m in the camp that feels that recordings are totally different to the live performances they captured. Even a bad show that was recorded beautifully might be interesting to listen to, just for the perspective it offers on what that situation was, why such things occurred…I have really begun to enjoy the recording process as an artistic one, as well.

Do you think there is room for discursive thought, as opposed to the idea of having an empty mind and being totally ‘in-the-moment’, in improvisation? Can discursive thoughts whilst playing be productive rather than distracting, and if so, do you have an idea as to when this might be the case?

My feelings are increasingly that immanence is quite important to playing live music of any kind, at least for me. It is about being in the “thick now” and experiencing all that richness. But I think these little spaces can open while playing where one makes a kind of conscious decision to work in a certain way. Or where one notices something isn’t working and has to make a marked decision on how to deal with it. So these little openings might be a space to enter into a different, specific kind of immanence, which really focusses the situation. But I’m such a beginner, really, I’m not sure how I’ll feel about this in even a year.

Can you name three albums/pieces/experiences that inspired you to start improvising, and three that are currently inspiring you?

Other than what I mentioned in the first question, the most earth-shaking experiences were:

Will Guthrie - a live performance in 2014 (and 2015, and 2017, and 2018…)
Alice Hui-Sheng Chang - a live performance at the 2015 Totally Huge New Music Festival
Morton Feldman - the Rothko Chapel/Why Patterns? CD on New Albion Records

Nowadays, these are of great consequence:

Michael Pisaro - Concentric Rings in Magnetic Levitation
Meredith Monk - Turtle Dreams
James Rushford - The Body’s Night

And seeing Jean-Luc Guionnet & Seijiro Murayama perform in Paris was pretty important as well. There’s so many more!

What do you feel should happen next to see further growth in exploratory music practice in Western Australia?

I think we just need more places to play, and to play for longer. Go deeper into things. The scene is at the point where the music is getting so strong that I think it’ll convince people purely by its quality of presence and the clear passionate commitment of the artists. I think growing audience matters - audiences bring a support and energy that is so vital - but its the raw power of the music that’s going to do that well before any marketing gimmicks or strategies. The existing platforms for this music in Perth all encourage short performances and this has been good for fostering a culture of participating and inviting new folks into the scene in a gentle way. But we should start making some occasions which facilitate magic happening!

I also think we have to find ways to really walk the walk of this music’s potential to bypass or oppose institutional ways of learning and understanding music. There are a lot of uphill battles there, but having recently done some workshops with high school kids and seeing how beneficial playing music in this way was for their focus and sense of play and freedom, finding enduring and sustainable ways of de-institutionalising this music feels important.

http://www.jostenmyburgh.com/

#73 - Other Layers, OVERLAY Tour Sessions

TRACE and VENN, the debut double release from OVERLAY, presented the first instantiation of a mode of ensemble operation that highlights the web of collaboration prevalent in improvising music scenes. The OVERLAY group, born of existing Perth trios with four members in common, Eduardo Cossio, Lenny Jacobs, Djuna Lee, and Dan O’Connor, set out to explore the musical connections reaching beyond these trios.

The TRACE and VENN Launch Tour presented an opportunity to generate new music through collaboration, with a focus on shared sounds through the OVERLAY subsets concept. Via two studio sessions, the first at Sydney’s A Sharp and the next at Melbourne’s Soundpark, OVERLAY welcomed Laura Altman, Sage Pbbbt, and Lyndon Blue to the ensemble. The group improvised in combinations of the participating musician, sans one member with each iteration.

The following audio presents a short sample of the sounds capture over this time, with a full release scheduled for 2020.

OVERLAY toured, collaborated and recorded with the support of the WA Department of Local Government, Sports and Cultural Industries.

Short cuts from the OVERLAY Launch Tour sessions 2019. Studio sessions across Sydney and Melbourne. OVERLAY: Eduardo Cossio - guitar Djuna Lee - double Bass Lenny Jacobs - drums Dan O'Connor - trumpet OTHERLAYERS Laura Altman - clarinet Lyndon Blue - violin Sage Pbbbt - voice